If everyone who voted for Stein had instead voted for Clinton, she would be the president-elect, not The Stain. Allow me to elaborate. These are the current vote totals in the deciding states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as I write this:
Michigan | Pennsylvania | Wisconsin | |
---|---|---|---|
Trump | 2,279,543 | 2,955,671 | 1,409,467 |
Clinton | 2,268,839 | 2,906,128 | 1,382,210 |
Trump's Margin | 10,704 | 49,543 | 27,257 |
Stein | 51,463 | 49,678 | 30,980 |
I wasn't planning to devote any more time to bashing Stein or her supporters, but it's now beyond doubt that those of you who voted for Stein have Nadered us again. If you voted for Stein because you thought Hillary is just as bad as The Stain, then either you're lying to yourself or you're simply deluded. Take a look at everything The Stain has done in just the past 24 DAYS since the election and tell me we wouldn't have been far better off with Clinton.
And no, Stein voters certainly aren't the only reason Clinton lost, but they deserve their share of the blame. Mostly they're culpable for picking up Republican talking points and attacking Clinton with them from the left, thus persuading thousands of moderate voters who otherwise would have been happy to vote for an honest, competent, mainstream Democrat to either vote for The Stain or stay home. There's no way to be sure, of course, but I think it's a fair estimate that for every vote Stein got, there were 3 other voters who would have voted for Clinton if Stein and her supporters hadn't been so eager to do The Stain's work for him. If that's even close to accurate, then without Stein selling The Stain's kool-aid, Clinton not only wins but it's not all that close.
And of course, now we can see that even though relatively few people voted for Stein, that alone was enough to put The Stain in the White House.
Are those principles of yours helping you to feel good right about now?
No comments:
Post a Comment