Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Game Over for Mueller

Well, this is bad news:
The Senate confirmed President Trump's nominee to lead the Justice Department's Criminal Division despite concerns about his ties to a bank that has come under scrutiny by the FBI.
. . .
"I cannot believe the Republican Party just rubber-stamped a nominee to head the Justice Department’s Criminal Division who has no prosecutorial experience, who chose to represent a Russian bank with deep ties to [Russian President] Vladimir Putin, and who would not commit to recuse himself from Russia-related matters if confirmed.This could prove to be a historic mistake," said Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat. 
 Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, also questioned if Benczkowski would give Attorney General Jeff Sessions insight into the investigation, from which he recused himself from last year. 
Actually, there's a bigger problem than the possibility that Benczkowski might share information with Attorney General Sessions, a man who, despite his many faults, at least seems to have sufficient integrity to really recuse himself from an investigation when he says he will.

No, the bigger problem is this.  If Trump decides to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, then Benczkowski would take his place.  And considering Benczkowski's ties to the Russians, I have no doubt he will end Robert Mueller's investigation if Trump tells him to.

For months now, pundits have been chattering about what the 'red line' is that Trump must not cross, lest the Republican Congress decides to retaliate.  I think this move makes it crystal clear that no such line exists.

After all, if Republicans in the Senate had any desire to protect Mueller, don't you think that at least one or two of them might have voted against a nominee like Benczkowski, who is obviously underqualified and having his own ties with the Russians?

The question now is pretty clearly not whether Trump will fire Mueller, but when.  Senate Republicans have just shown him that he will pay no price for doing so.

Working Class Watch - Day 533

Conventional wisdom has it that the working class (okay --- working class whites, specifically) were the key demographic supporting Trump in 2016.  How's that working out for them?
Tariffs levied by America's trading partners, such as China, kick in on Friday as retaliation for Trump's heavy taxation of their imports. Farmers in the heartland say that a drawn-out trade war could lead to more farms going bankrupt or selling out.
"The banks are not going to keep writing checks to save your farm," Matt Thiede, chief operating officer of Heeren brothers, a produce packing company in Comstock Park, Michigan, told NBC News. "For some family farms, one season could be the death of them."
Yes, those 'farmers in the heartland' are getting what they voted for.  I might feel sorry for them if their votes weren't flushing the rest of the country down the toilet with them.

Sunday, July 8, 2018

Disgrace

It all began when Vice President Mike Pence used the word 'disgrace' in a tweet:
This got me to thinking that Pence doesn't really understand the meaning of the word 'disgrace', and so I decided to spell it out for him.  And since I've wanted to do an immigration post for a while, I decided to expound on my reply here, where space is not so limited.

Disgrace 1: On May 7, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a new 'zero tolerance' policy on immigration.  This is a transparent attempt to create a crisis at the border, with the well-known side effect of forcibly separating children from their parents.  This includes not only children of parents who cross the U.S. border illegally, but also those who come seeking asylum, which is legal.  The long-term effects of family separation on children are serious and often permanent, which is only part of what makes this policy a disgrace.  The other part is that the Trump administration is visiting these horrors on approximately 3,000 children for the sole purpose of trying to get Democrats to agree to Trump's pointless and stupid wall.

Disrgrace 2: It's bad enough that the administration separated these families in the first place.  It takes the disgrace to another level that they obviously took these children away without any plan to reunite them, ever.  They permanently destroyed these families in service to their political agenda.

Disgrace 3: In addition to having no plan to reunite these children with their families, they also clearly had no plan to adequately care for the children in their custody.  And since they have roughly 3,000 children in their charge, that should really count as 3,000 separate disgraces.  Some lowlights include forcibly giving the kids psychotropic drugs, a 1-year-old returned to his mother after 12 weeks covered in lice, after apparently not having been bathed the whole time, and this:
An investigative report by the Associated Press reveals widespread abuse at Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Center in Virginia, where children as young as 14 claim they were tied to chairs with bags over their heads, “beaten while handcuffed and locked up for long periods in solitary confinement, left nude and shivering in concrete cells.”
Disgrace 4: Literally holding the children hostage, demanding that their parents agree to 'voluntary' deportation before reuniting them with their children --- despite the fact that they are under court order to reunite the families unconditionally.

Disgrace 5: Making a mockery of law and order by literally having the immigrant children represent themselves in deportation hearings, including children as young as 1 year old.

Disgrace 6: Attacking all immigrants as members of MS-13, 'infesting' U.S. cities, when fewer than 0.1% of immigrants crossing the border in fiscal year 2017 had gang ties, according to Border Patrol:
Since the Trump administration took office, the Border Patrol has detected fewer gang members crossing irregularly than during the Obama administration. In FY2017, these detections amounted to 0.075 percent of the total number of migrants (228 MS-13 members out of 303,916 total migrants). When combined with MS-13’s rival, the Barrio 18 gang, the number rises only slightly to 0.095 percent. This is far from the “infestation” of violent gang members described by the president.
Disgrace 7: As noted above, almost none of the immigrants being rounded up and separated from their families have gang ties.  But the threat of MS-13 and others IS real --- and is the reason why many of these people seek asylum in America.

Trump and his minions are rounding these people up to return them to their home countries, in some cases, to certain death.  In one particularly egregious example, an MS-13 gang member who decided to cooperate with the FBI was nevertheless imprisoned and slated for deportation and certain death.  Despite the fact that he tried to turn his life around in an effort to limit the spread of the MS-13 in America.

If defeating MS-13 is the real purpose of 'zero tolerance' (and not, you know, racist ethnic cleansing), shouldn't we encourage MS-13 gang members to reform themselves and help the feds, rather than effectively punishing them with a death sentence?

Disgrace 8: Forming a 'denaturalization task force' to strip citizenship from people who came to the U.S. legally and have already become naturalized citizens.

Disgrace 9: Deporting honorably-discharged veterans who also happen to be immigrants.  These men put their lives on the line for America, and the Trump administration has chosen to thank them by forcing them out of the country.

Disgrace 10: Discharging non-citizens who are currently serving in the military.  There can only be two reasons for this policy: 1) Pre-emptively avoiding the embarrassment of deporting these service members at some point in the future after they have been honorably discharged, 2) Naked racism.  Neither reason reflects well on the U.S.

Disgrace 11: Trying sweep disgraces 1-10 under the rug by pointing to the successes ICE has had, and denouncing anyone who points out these disgraces as favoring 'open borders', terrorism, or human trafficking.

There is literally no reason ICE --- or some equivalent agency --- can't effectively fight human trafficking without committing some of the same sins as the traffickers.

For all of the fearmongering coming from the administration, the fact is that ICE didn't even exist until 2003.  Yet somehow, the U.S. did a reasonable job of fighting terrorism and human trafficking before that.

And it's worth noting that even the ICE agents of HSI --- the ICE division responsible for combating terrorism and human trafficking --- want nothing to do with Trump's anti-immigrant policies, because "anger at ERO immigration practices is harming the entire agency’s reputation and undermining other law enforcement agencies’ willingness to cooperate".


Saturday, June 16, 2018

Hostages

Trump is holding immigrant children and families hostage.  He's admitted as much.

This abomination of a presidency needs to end.


Legislation to #EndFamilySeparation

If you haven't heard by now about the Trump administration's new policy to (effectively) kidnap the children of undocumented families crossing the border, you should:
In recent weeks, the personal cruelty of Donald Trump has been translated into official United States policy — and the human toll is staggering. The Intercept, which has done some strong reporting on the growing moral crisis at the border, did the math and calculated that at least 1,358 children — and possibly closer to 1,500 to 2,000 — have already been separated from their parents in only the first month or so of the administration’s “zero-tolerance” scheme. In addition, the flood of asylum-seekers suddenly facing criminal prosecution has led to mass trials that present a dystopian nightmare view of modern America.
. . .
We all know now what’s happened to America these last 506 days. The question is, What are you and I going to do about this? As some have noted since the early days of the Trump administration, whatever you would have done during the other great moral crises that have afflicted our modern world — the Holocaust, or the fight to end segregation in the American South — is what you are doing, or not doing, right now.
I've put together a list of possible actions we can take to fight back.  But for now, I want to discuss legislative solutions that are being considered.

Even though Trump initiated this policy on his own, with the enthusiastic support of Jeff Sessions, he now wants the public to believe that somehow the Democrats created this problem, and he demands that the Democrats solve it.

In trying to pin the blame on the Democrats, Trump is, as always, a despicable liar.  He could reverse his policy in an instant if he wanted to.  But nevertheless, Democrats ARE working toward a legislative solution.

In the Senate, Dianne Feinstein has introduced the Keep Families Together Act, would do exactly what the name suggests: prevent federal authorities from separating families at the border.  As of this writing, it currently has the support of 43 Democrats and NO Republicans.

In the House, there are (at least) two bills under consideration; one drafted by Republicans and one by Democrats.  And here, the GOP is playing games with these childrens' lives (which was the choice Trump made by starting to separate families in the first place).

While Speaker Paul Ryan and others claim that their bill will end family separation, those who have studied it insist that --- surprise! --- it won't:
The draft bill, crafted as a compromise between conservative and moderate Republicans, includes longstanding White House demands that would make it easier to detain children for longer periods, deport them more quickly, and make it harder for their families to claim asylum under the law. It also contains a list of other White House priorities, including cuts to legal immigration and funding for a border wall, as well as a path to legal status for recipients of DACA, called Dreamers.
But immigration lawyers, policy analysts and activists say that there's no language in the bill that overrules the Trump administration's decision to criminally prosecute parents, which places them in federal custody away from their children and is the direct cause of the current wave of family separation — nearly 2,000 kids have been taken from their parents in recent months, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
So the Republicans are using this bill as a Trojan Horse, telling people it will end family separation, while instead it's simply a laundry list of GOP priorities to further curtail legal immigration.

Please don't vote for Republicans.

Although there is no bill currently under consideration in the House to end family separation, House and Senate Democrats have each introduced the HELP Separated Children Act, which aims to protect the safety and welfare of children separated from their families.

Please contact your representatives and ask that they support the two Democratic bills, and don't be taken in by Republican lies that their bill will solve the problem.

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Family Separation is Still Happening

Just a reminder: It is still official U.S. government policy to separate immigrant children from their families.  The number of children now separated in this manner is north of 1,300, and will continue growing until the Trump administration stops --- or someone stops them:
We all know now what’s happened to America these last 506 days. The question is, What are you and I going to do about this? As some have noted since the early days of the Trump administration, whatever you would have done during the other great moral crises that have afflicted our modern world — the Holocaust, or the fight to end segregation in the American South — is what you are doing, or not doing, right now.
A reminder that you may have the chance to speak out about this horror on June 14 --- although sadly, it seems that there aren't events in every city (including mine).

And here are suggestions for other things you can do.

Monday, June 4, 2018

Thing Everyone Knows: No One is Above the Law

No matter what your politics are, you should want to crush this ASAP:
"If he shot James Comey, he'd be impeached the next day," Giuliani was quoted as saying. "Impeach him, and then you can do whatever you want to do to him."
Giuliani, who is representing Trump amid special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, also appeared on a pair of talk shows Sunday.
On both, Giuliani argued that the president probably has the sweeping constitutional authority to pardon even himself of federal crimes.
Under normal circumstances, Congress would immediately convene hearings on the matter, with an eye toward impeachment.  Under normal circumstances, the media would scramble to get every member of Congress --- but especially members of the president's party --- on record either supporting this authoritarian view or condemning it.

But in case you haven't noticed, these aren't normal times.  So it's up to us, the citizens, to badger our representatives into taking a stand either for or against the rule of law.