Friday, January 24, 2020

Take Her Out

The latest in a long list of Trump's transgressions seems more than usually explosive:
A recording reviewed by ABC News appears to capture President Donald Trump telling associates he wanted the then-U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch fired while speaking at a small gathering that included Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman -- two former business associates of Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani who have since been indicted in New York.
. . .
"Get rid of her!" is what the voice that appears to be Trump’s is heard saying. "Get her out tomorrow. I don't care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. OK? Do it."
It is utterly baffling that ABC presents this as Trump wanting Yovanovitch fired.  As numerous Trump supporters have pointed out since this news became public, all U.S. ambassadors serve "at the pleasure of the president", as they used to say on the West Wing, and so if Trump wanted her removed, all he needed to do was call HER and fire her.

Moreover, Parnas and Fruman are not U.S. civil servants, or government employees in any way.  It seems fairly clear that Trump's instruction to "take her out" can't possibly refer to firing her.  And if Trump wasn't ordering Parnas and Furman to fire her, we are forced to conclude that Trump's intent was more sinister.

As unthinkable as it is that a sitting U.S. president would demand that private citizens do harm to a U.S. ambassador, it is completely consistent with Trump's approach to 'governance' (for lack of a better term).  He has a long, colorful history of dehumanizing rhetoric and promoting violence.  Consider:

  • He took out full-page ads in four separate newspapers demanding the death penalty for five young men accused of gang-raping a woman in Central Park.  Trump continued to insist the 'Central Park Five' were guilty long after DNA evidence and a confession from another man proved them innocent.
  • Trump kicked off his presidential campaign by insisting that Mexican immigrants tend to be 'rapists' bringing 'drugs' and 'crime' to the U.S.  Three years later, he doubled-down on that belief, saying "These aren't people. These are animals."
  • His hatred for people of color and immigrants isn't exclusive to Mexicans, as he frequently talks about 'infestation' when discussing predominantly black cities, and referring to 'shithole countries'.
  • This isn't just talk.  Trump actually treated illegal immigrants as animals, showing no remorse even in the face of sexual abuse and death in detainment facilities.
  • His rhetoric isn't limited to name-calling.  He explicitly campaigned, in part, on a promise to 'take out their families' --- innocent people, mind you --- as a way to combat terrorism.  Does that phrase sound familiar?
  • He openly encourages violence against the media, including praising a GOP congressman who literally assaulted a reporter.
  • He similarly encouraged law enforcement to physically abuse suspects (so much for 'innocent until proven guilty').
  • If you're inclined to believe that Trump is all bark and no bite, recall that even Pentagon officials were stunned by Trump's bloodlust.  When presented with several options for handling Iran, Trump made the most extreme choice (assassinating Soleimani), even though that option was only presented to him to make other choices seems moderate.
This is a watershed moment in Trump's presidency.  Republicans in the Senate are on the verge of turning a blind eye to his behavior, which seems incredibly dangerous.  An acquittal will be a green light to Trump to give in to his worst instincts, and there's every reason to believe that those instincts are violent.  If the Senate doesn't remove Trump from the White House now, it is more likely than not that he will only leave in a body bag (death either by natural causes or as a result of some violent upheaval).

As awful as Trump's reign has been up to now, it is likely to be small potatoes compared to Trump unchained.  In fact, Trump has already given Senators a small taste of what they can expect:
CBS News reported late Thursday that a “Trump confidant” had issued a warning to wavering Republican Senators: “Vote against the president, and your head will be on a pike.”
Yes, this is just a metaphor --- but if Trump survives this trial, it is likely to be closer to reality than most are willing to imagine.

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Demand a #FairSenateTrial

First, Trump released a damning transcript of his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, claiming that it exonerated him.  This is what prompted impeachment hearings in the House.

Those hearings made it clear not only that Trump was demanding that Ukraine announce a bogus investigation into Joe Biden and his son in exchange for $400 million in foreign aid which had already been approved by Congress, but that he and his administration were working to cover it up.  At this point, GOP defenses for Trump have all been laughable, such as:
  • We can't remove such a great president - this is self-evidently absurd
  • Trump's impeachment is unconstitutional - Article II of the Constitution disagrees
  • Trump committed no crime in withholding congressionally-approved funds in exchange for Ukraine's interference in the 2020 election - This sounds reasonable at first blush.  But the truth is that there is a deeply-grounded understanding in western law that non-criminal acts can be impeachable.  And then a few days ago, the Government Accountability Office concluded that Trump's actions were criminal anyway.
Despite the fact that this is an open-and-shut case to anyone who hasn't drunk the Trump Kool-Aid, multiple key players in the Senate have committed to willful ignorance, including most shamefully Lindsey Graham, who was one of Trump's few GOP critics 4 years ago; and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

And McConnell isn't content to remain in ignorance all by himself.  McConnell and most (all?) other Republicans are so afraid of the truth that they don't want to hear witness testimony.  This clearly coordinates nicely with the Trump administration strategy of ignoring all House subpoenas.

The situation was already set up to be a laughable kangaroo court, before Lev Parnas went on the Rachel Maddow show on Wednesday, January 15 and directly implicated Trump in the criminal act.  He also implicated Mike Pence, Attorney General Bill Barr, and Republican congressman Devin Nunes.

In a sane world, Parnas would have been the first witness called by the Senate.  Actually, in a sane world, Mitch McConnell would already have traveled to the White House with Nancy Pelosi to explain to Trump that a vote for his removal is inevitable, and that he should resign immediately for the good of the country.

But of course, there is no honor among thieves, and there is no honor in the Republican party.  They still won't commit to hearing witness testimony, including alleged 'moderates' like Susan Collins of Maine.  Martha McSally of Arizona, who was actually defeated in her Senate race last fall, then appointed to John McCain's vacant seat, displayed Trumplike immaturity when, in response to a reporter's question about witnesses, called him a 'liberal hack' and slammed the door in his face. (Predictably, the Cult of Trump is applauding McSally's temper tantrum).

Obviously, Republicans are cowards who are afraid to cross Trump.  But the main reason they don't want to cross Trump is because they want to keep their seats in the Senate.  If appeals to common sense, the rule of law, or the Constitution were enough to make Republicans do the right thing, they would have done it by now.

So we need to use the only tool we have left: Make it clear to them that pledging allegiance to Trump instead of the country comes with a price.  Specifically, let them know that their cowardice will put money in their opponents' pockets.

Below, I have listed the 22 Republican senators up for re-election this year, and (where known) their Democratic opponents.  I'm urging everyone to donate what they can to these Democrats, and then let the Republicans know that the donations will keep coming unless they demand a #FairSenateTrial.

I have included contact information for the Republicans.  However, since most Senators filter out email from people who don't live in their state, I have also included their Twitter handles, so you can @ them directly.


State Candidates Notes
Alaska Incumbent: (R) - Dan Sullivan
@SenDanSullivan
Challenger: (D) - ???
Arizona Incumbent: (R) - Martha McSally
@SenMcSallyAZ
McSally was appointed to John McCain's Senate seat last year after losing an election to Kyrsten Sinema 50.0% to 47.6%, and so faces an uphill battle
Challenger: (D) - Mark Kelly
Donate
Arkansas Incumbent: (R) - Tom Cotton
@SenTomCotton
Challenger: (D) - ???
Colorado Incumbent: (R) - Cory Gardner
@SenCoryGardner
Hickenlooper is a very popular former governor, so Gardner is likely toast
Challenger: (D) - John Hickenlooper
Donate
Georgia Incumbent: (R) - David Perdue
@sendavidperdue
Challenger: (D) - ???
Georgia Incumbent: (R) - Kelly Loeffler
@kloeffler
Loeffler was appointed to fill Johnny Isakson's seat, and has been in office less than a month. Georgia has been trending purple, so there's a decent chance of a Dem pickup here
Challenger: (D) - ???
Idaho Incumbent: (R) - Jim Risch
@SenatorRisch
Challenger: (D) - ???
Iowa Incumbent: (R) - Joni Ernst
@SenJoniErnst
Challenger: (D) - Theresa Greenfield
Donate
Kansas Incumbent: (R) - Pat Roberts
@SenPatRoberts
Roberts is retiring --- but still prefers Trump to the Constitution
Challenger: (D) - ???
Kentucky Incumbent: (R) - Mitch McConnell
@senatemajldr
Challenger: (D) - Amy McGrath
Donate
Louisiana Incumbent: (R) - Bill Cassidy
@SenBillCassidy
Challenger: (D) - ???
Maine Incumbent: (R) - Susan Collins
@SenatorCollins
Challenger: (D) - Sara Gideon
Donate
Mississippi Incumbent: (R) - Cindy Hyde-Smith
@SenHydeSmith
This is a rematch of a 2018 special election, where Hyde-Smith defeated Espy 53.6% - 46.4%
Challenger: (D) - Mike Espy
Donate
Montana Incumbent: (R) - Steve Daines
@SteveDaines
Challenger: (D) - ???
Nebraska Incumbent: (R) - Ben Sasse
@BenSasse
Challenger: (D) - ???
North Carolina Incumbent: (R) - Thom Tillis
@SenThomTillis
We don't know yet who will challenge Tillis, but ActBlue is taking donations and holding them until the Democratic nominee is determined
Challenger: (D) - ???
Donate
Oklahoma Incumbent: (R) - James Inhofe Inhofe might be retiring --- but still prefers Trump to the Constitution
Challenger: (D) - ???
South Carolina Incumbent: (R) - Lindsey Graham
@LindseyGrahamSC
Challenger: (D) - Jaime Harrison
Donate
South Dakota Incumbent: (R) - Mike Rounds
@SenatorRounds
Challenger: (D) - ???
Tennessee Incumbent: (R) - Lamar Alexander Alexander is retiring --- but still prefers Trump to the Constitution
Challenger: (D) - ???
Texas Incumbent: (R) - John Cornyn
@JohnCornyn
Challenger: (D) - MJ Hegar
Donate
West Virginia Incumbent: (R) - Shelley Moore-Capito
@SenCapito
Challenger: (D) - ???
Wyoming Incumbent: (R) - Michael Enzi
@SenatorEnzi
Enzi is retiring --- but still prefers Trump to the Constitution
Challenger: (D) - ???

I have made donations to all of the challengers listed here.  I urge you to do the same, and let all of these Republican Senators know that the contributions will continue unless they allow to hear witness testimony and conduct a #FairSenateTrial!